To mitigate the risks associated with worker misclassification, companies are urged to take a proactive stance. Withum’s employee classification tool provides a valuable resource for businesses seeking to self-correct and align with IRS guidelines.
By answering a series of questions through this online platform, companies can gain insights into how the IRS would classify their workers, thereby avoiding costly employment tax disputes with the government.
Misclassifying employees as subcontractors can result in a cascade of penalties, as determined by the IRS.
For intentional misclassification, the consequences escalate, with the IRS holding employers responsible for 100% of FICA and income taxes, along with severe penalties and interest.
Beyond financial penalties, misclassifying workers exposes companies to legal action. High-profile lawsuits against industry giants such as Uber, FedEx, and Citigroup highlight the gravity of this issue. In 2020, FedEx Ground Package Systems settled a lawsuit for $2.4 million, addressing allegations of misclassifying drivers as independent contractors. As a result, the spotlight on misclassification has grown, prompting increased scrutiny from states, government officials, and individual businesses.
Despite efforts to address the issue, the IRS estimates that millions of workers are still misclassified today. State-level studies suggest that 10-20% of employers misclassify at least one worker as an independent contractor. Recognizing the widespread nature of this problem, various initiatives are underway to combat misclassification, involving collaboration between states, government bodies, and businesses.
Take a proactive approach with Withum’s Employee Classification Tool.
What Is a Basket Swap? For years, many fund managers and tax advisers viewed the 70/30 basket swap, a derivative that references a basket of securities rather than a single position, as a reliable way to manage investment risk while preserving the intended tax treatment of the underlying positions. The premise was straightforward: if a…
The IRS recently issued Revenue Procedure 2026-32, providing welcome clarification for taxpayers that improperly deducted domestic research and experimental (R&E) expenditures in tax years 2022 through 2024 and are now seeking to align with the capitalization requirements enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The guidance confirms that taxpayers may, in the same 2025…
Artificial intelligence is driving unprecedented demand for data center capacity, prompting states across the country to reconsider how these facilities are taxed, regulated, and integrated into existing infrastructure. As policymakers weigh the economic benefits of AI-driven investment against growing concerns over electricity demand, grid reliability, water consumption, and public costs, the focus is shifting from…
Data centers have become critical infrastructure for the modern economy. Artificial intelligence models, cloud platforms, financial systems, healthcare applications, defense technologies, cybersecurity platforms and communications networks all rely on physical computing infrastructure capable of storing and processing vast volumes of information. According to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), data centers currently consume approximately 4%…
The Tax Court’s recent decision in Bowen v. Commissioner provides new guidance on the scope of potential Covid-era refund claims arising from Kwong v. United States. To understand the ramifications of Bowen for taxpayers who are potentially eligible for refunds under Kwong, it is helpful to begin with what the Kwong case established. What Kwong Established The…