California State Tax Updates

Our Dash of SALT Blog provides the most recent developments and changes in state and local tax regulations. Here are the latest updates for California.

June 24, 2025

The California Competes Tax Credit Committee revoked or reduced approximately $76 million in tax credits from 24 companies for failing to meet hiring and investment commitments. One company lost a $20.5 million credit due to unfulfilled plans to create 1,065 jobs and $200 million in investments, while another lost a $10 million credit for not creating 320 jobs and $2.1 billion in investments. Meanwhile, the committee awarded $34 million in new credits to five companies with the expectation of meeting their goals.

This action, part of the final round of awards for the fiscal year ending June 30, reflects a trend of credit cancellations outpacing new awards, resulting in a $645 million program surplus. Established in 2014 to incentivize job creation in California, the California Competes program requires companies to meet commitments before claiming credits. According to program officials, despite ongoing applications, few companies can prove the credits significantly influence their expansion decisions. While California Competes seeks to make California an attractive state where to do business, taxpayers are obligated to meet (or exceed) their commitments to obtain the credits granted.

If you have questions about state incentives, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

April 1, 2025

On April 8, 2025, the San Francisco Tax Collector will hold a public hearing to discuss a market sourcing proposal for Business Tax. “Proposition M” approved by taxpayers on November 5, 2024, which restructured many aspects of San Francisco Business Tax, required the Tax Collector to issue additional guidance on how businesses must allocate their receipts. The proposal is similar to a recent California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) proposal. The Tax Collector proposes market-based sourcing and allows a Reasonable Approximation method of sourcing for taxpayers who do not have a customer billing address or a customer commercial domicile location.

If you have questions about San Francisco taxes, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

March 27, 2025

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) recently summarized several key tax legislation changes enacted in 2024. Notably, there is a three-year suspension of net operating losses (NOLs) and a cap on certain business tax credits, limiting them to $5 million annually. This suspension applies to taxable years from January 1, 2024, to January 1, 2027. However, businesses with net incomes under $1 million or disaster loss carryovers are exempt from the suspension. The carryover period for suspended losses is extended by up to three years, depending on when the losses were incurred. Additionally, businesses can elect to receive a refundable credit for disallowed credits due to the $5 million cap, spread over five years. If not elected, these credits can be carried over with an extended period.

If you have questions about California state tax credits and NOL treatment, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team for more information. 

March 5, 2025

Authored by: Chao Zhang and Katie Nguyen, CPA

California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order that stops penalties, costs, and interest on late property tax payments for properties damaged by the Palisades Fire. The relief suspends interest, penalties and costs until April 10, 2026, for property owners who were current on their property taxes as of January 7, 2025 (the date the State of Emergency was declared). Property owners delinquent on or before January 6, 2025, are not eligible for relief.

If you have questions about state tax disaster relief provisions, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 30, 2025

California Governor Gavin Newsom’s fiscal 2026 budget proposes significant changes, including increased incentives for the movie industry, an extension of the SALT cap workaround, and the adoption of single-sales-factor apportionment for financial institutions. The budget also proposes to partially exclude military retirement benefits from state income tax and broadly exempt wildfire settlements from taxation for the next four years. The plan includes $228.9 billion in general fund spending and $322.3 billion in total spending. Newsom’s proposal to expand the film and television tax credit is expected to initially reduce revenues but bolster California’s entertainment industry. The application of single-factor sales apportionment to financial institutions is projected to increase state tax revenues. The budget seeks to extend the state’s workaround on state and local tax deductions beyond the scheduled 12/31/2025 sunset.

If you have questions about state tax changes, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 30, 2025

California’s 2026 fiscal year budget proposes to increase the annual cap of the State’s film and television credit to $750 million beginning in 2026 through fiscal year 2030. The current annual cap is $330 million. Governor Gavin Newsom proposed to increase the credit to further support the entertainment industry, which has a large presence within the state. Governor Newsom also proposed to extend the pass-through entity tax election, allowing owners of pass-through entities to make state tax payments at the entity level to work around the federal $10,000 state and local tax deduction cap. The budget also includes a proposal to change the apportionment formula for financial institutions from three-factor apportionment to single sales factor apportionment beginning with tax year 2025. For more details, please review the State’s Governor’s Budget Summary.

If you have questions about how state budgets affect your business, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

December 3, 2024

On November 6, 2024, San Francisco voters passed Proposition M, which will lead to important changes to the city’s business taxes by simplifying the tax compliance process and alleviating the tax burden on small businesses. Proposition M changes include changes to the gross receipts tax, homelessness gross receipts tax, overpaid executive gross receipts tax, administrative office tax, and business registration fees. Proposition M also increases business tax exemptions and changes how the city calculates taxes. In addition, the San Francisco Office of the Treasurer and Tax Collector must establish an advance-determination process to provide written guidance to taxpayers. These changes go into effect on January 1, 2025.

If you have any questions about this update, please contact the Withum SALT Team.

November 7, 2024

The San Francisco voters could significantly change the city’s Gross Receipts Tax if either Ballot Measures L and/or M pass. Proposition L would add an additional tax on ride-share companies and transportation service providers using autonomous vehicles. The additional transportation tax would range from 1.5% to 4.5% of the business’s gross receipts exceeding $500,000. Proposition M will reduce the city’s gross receipts tax rate classifications from fourteen (14) to seven (7). Additionally, Proposition M will raise the gross receipts tax rates from 0.053% to 1.008% to 0.1% to 3.716%.

If you have questions about whether your business may be affected by Propositions M or L, please contact a member of the Withum SALT Team.

November 4, 2024

Authored by: Breea Boylan, CPA and Courtney Easterday, MSA

On September 29, 2024, California Gov. Newsom enacted SB No. 946. Beginning on or after taxable periods January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2029, California will allow for an exclusion from gross income for amounts received by a qualified taxpayer as a California-qualified wildfire loss mitigation payment. The following definitions apply:

If you have questions about California taxes, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

September 27, 2024

Authored by: Leroy Solis, MBA and Courtney Easterday, MSA

The California Franchise Tax Board has proposed updates to its market-based sourcing rules for sales of intangibles, including asset management fees and government contracts. These changes aim to simplify compliance and tax administration by revising sales assignment rules and establishing specific guidelines for certain industries. Businesses such as management, tax, accounting, payroll, legal, business advisory, technology consulting, and investment advisory services may be affected. We will publish further guidance as the revised rules are finalized.

If you have questions about state income tax apportionment, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

September 20, 2024

Authored by: Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA and Kiana McGowan, CPA, MBA

On September 10, 2024, the California legislature unanimously approved A.B. 52, a bill that would provide a manufacturing tax credit for qualified manufacturing equipment and research and development (R&D) purchases. Currently, the state offers a partial sales tax exemption on the purchase of equipment at a reduced rate of 3.9375 percent. The proposed bill, which now awaits Governor Gavin Newsom’s signature, includes a full exemption through an income tax credit equal to the total local sales tax paid.

The income tax credit would be available on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, concurrent with the existing partial sales tax exemption on and after January 1, 2014, and before July 1, 2030. This approach, rather than a full sales tax exemption as was proposed in 2022 and vetoed due to concerns over local revenue loss, ensures that localities do not lose revenues. The bill aims to support the growth of the manufacturing industry by enabling businesses to invest in new equipment and R&D and provide higher wages to Californians.

If you have questions about sales tax exemptions and incentives, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

September 4, 2024

Authored by: Emilia Jarrin and Katie Nguyen, CPA

On August 16, 2024, California Gov. Newsom signed S.B. 1144. Effective July 1, 2025, S.B. 1144 revises the definition of “high-volume third-party seller” to refer specifically to a third-party seller operating on an online marketplace. This revised definition eliminates the requirement that transactions must be conducted via an online marketplace which also processes the corresponding payments. Instead, S.B., 1144 only requires transactions made “utilizing” an online marketplace to be subject to marketplace seller rules.

S.B. 1144 broadens the range of transactions that can classify a seller as a high–volume third-party seller and eliminates the requirement for the platform to have a contractual relationship with consumers. Furthermore, the bill mandates high-volume sellers to notify the law enforcement about stolen goods. California law mandates that an online marketplace must suspend the sales activities of high–volume third-party sellers that fail to comply with information retention and security disclosure requirements.

If you have questions about marketplace seller requirements, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

August 23, 2024

Authored by: Courtney Easterday, MSA and Ryan Schupp

Effective October 1, 2024, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration has announced that rate changes in certain counties and cities will increase. The state announced that the following cities would have an increase in tax by .25% – .75%: Benicia, Grass Valley, La Canada Flintridge, and Truckee. The following counties can expect the same range of increase: Calaveras and Sonoma. Furthermore, the state announced that effective June 1, 2024, it will create a new city, City of Mountain House (San Joaquin County).

If you have questions about local sales tax compliance, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

August 23, 2024

Authored by: Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA and Brandon Spinella

The California Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) upheld a sales tax assessment of approximately $120,000 against Snowmagic Inc., a New Jersey company, after finding that its process of making artificial snow for customers was a taxable sale of tangible personal property because customers provide the materials used in the processing. (See R&TC, §6006(b); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, §1526(a).) The OTA also analyzed whether the transfer of tangible personal property was incidental to the service provided; however, the contracts were silent as to the amount for installation of the snow, so there was no basis for excluding these charges from their gross taxable sales. Although the taxpayer was granted relief from failure to file penalties due to reasonable reliance on legal advice, it was not granted relief from interest. (OTA Case No. 21088332; CDTFA Case ID: 831-380; Matter of Snowmagic Inc.; 2024-OTA-308).

If you have questions about whether your business is required to collect and remit sales taxes, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

July 30, 2024

Authored by: Katie Nguyen, CPA and Katerine Velasquez

On July 1, 2024, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) released Publication 126 regarding mandatory use tax registration for service enterprises. The publication contains detailed information about the use tax, who needs to file, how to remit, the difference between sales and use tax, the obligations of registered businesses, and the penalties for late filing.

For more information about California’s mandatory use tax registration, please refer to Publication 126.

If you have questions about California’s mandatory use tax registration, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

July 8, 2024

Authored by: Brandon Mejia and Katie Nguyen, CPA

On June 20, 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gov. Gavin Newsom on the constitutionality of an anti-tax measure, thus denying the measure from appearing on the November ballot. The ballot item would have made it more difficult for the California Legislature to enact new or increase taxes without first seeking voter approval. The California Supreme Court unanimously denied this provision from appearing on the ballot as the referendum would significantly alter California’s governmental structure. The measure would not only alter the state’s tax procedures but would also affect the state’s Constitution. As such, the Court ruled the only way to enact the changes proposed by the ballot measure is through a State Constitutional Convention or legislation.

If you have questions about current events in State and Local Taxation, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

April 1, 2024

Authored by: Courtney Easterday, MSA and Kiana McGowan, CPA, MBA

On February 16, 2024, Senator Glazer of the California Senate’s Revenue and Taxation Committee introduced SB 1501, which would allow eligible entities the opportunity to make a CA PTE Tax election even if they did not meet the June 15th prepayment deadline. Historically, an entity would become ineligible to make a PTE Tax election if prepayments were not made timely or were underpaid. If enacted, it would be retroactive to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2024. The entity would also be subject to a penalty of 5% of the PTE tax plus interest, which must be paid by the original due date of the taxpayer’s return.

Please see a copy of the bill here for additional details.

If you have questions about making a Pass-Through Entity Tax election, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

March 20, 2024

Authored by: Jessie Racioppi and Penny Sweeting, CPA

On March 1, 2024, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration released a guide to help home-based businesses understand their sales and use tax obligations. The guide includes tips on the registration process and return filing. It also provides guidance on records taxpayers should maintain for complete and accurate tax filings, a list of exemptions, and industry-specific tips. To view the full guide visit Tax Guide for Home-Based Businesses (ca.gov).

If you have any questions about sales and use tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

March 19, 2024

Authored by: Breea Boylan, CPA and Katie Nguyen, CPA

The State of California Franchise Tax Board announced tax relief for San Diego County residents in response to the flooding, which was declared a major disaster. Affected individuals and businesses in San Diego County have been granted an extension until June 17 to file their tax returns and pay federal and state taxes due between January 21 through June 17, 2024. This extension to file and pay includes the following:

For additional information, please refer to the FTB’s press release.

If you have questions about California’s disaster relief provisions, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 22, 2024

Authored by: Jonathan Weinberg, JD, LLM, Principal and Ryan Schupp

The California Franchise Tax Board recently provided taxpayers with information regarding refundable tax credits, disaster loss relief, and the advantages of filing electronically. Additionally, the FTB publicized its penalty abatement program for tax years starting on or after 2022. Taxpayers may be eligible for a one-time penalty abatement as long as the taxpayer has not been granted this abatement and has no outstanding tax liabilities. They also noted that eligible taxpayers can receive refundable credits through the California Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC), the Young Child Tax Credit (YCTC), and the Foster Youth Tax Credit (FYTC). California taxpayers with incomes up to $30,950 can receive a cashback worth up to $3,529 for CalEITC, while incomes up to $30,931 for YCTC and FYTC can receive up to $1,117. Finally, the board noted that taxpayers affected by a disaster can claim a deduction for disaster loss. Taxpayers can use Form FTB 3516 to write in the name of the disaster. The California Franchise Tax Board encourages all taxpayers to file through CalFile to receive real-time confirmation and ensure the fastest refund.

If you have questions about California taxes, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 8, 2024

Authored by: Jessie Racioppi and Katie Nguyen, CPA

General Motors claims in a lawsuit against San Francisco that the city unfairly assessed tax based on the presence of the company’s Cruise self-driving unit. The company, with few San Francisco employees and locations within the city, argues that the presence of the Cruise unit doesn’t accurately represent the revenue attributable to the city. GM has paid $108 million in San Francisco tax over a seven-year period.

San Francisco used the Cruise unit payroll to apportion revenue to the city. It appears that San Francisco took the position that all employees of the Cruise unit were deemed San Francisco employees. GM claims the City’s apportionment methodology is “inherently distortive” as many employees work from home and not all employees reside in San Francisco. While GM grosses billions, the Company derived less than $1 million of sales in San Francisco. As such, GM contends that San Francisco’s statutory apportionment method does not fairly represent GM’s revenue derived from San Francisco sources.

If you have questions about fair apportionment, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

October 13, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Spinella and Katie Nguyen, CPA

On October 8, 2023, California Governor Newsome signed a law extending the sales and use tax exemptions for water carrier’s purchases of petroleum products to 1/1/2029.

If you have questions about whether your business purchases are exempt, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

October 9, 2023

Authored by: Leroy Solis, MBA and Jonathan Weinberg, JD, LLM, Principal

On September 30, 2023, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed S.B. 264, extending the state’s disaster relief deduction through December 31, 2028. Both individual and corporate taxpayers are eligible for the deduction. Previously, the state’s disaster loss deduction was scheduled to sunset at the end of 2023.

If you have questions about state disaster relief provisions, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

September 27, 2023

Authored by: Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA and Katerine Velasquez

On September 20, 2023, the California Department of Tax and Fee Admiration (“CDTFA”) published its September sales and use tax update. The September update states that the CDTFA is phasing out limited access codes for quarterly sales tax filers. All quarterly filers who are presently using limited access codes are required to update their online accounts. Affected taxpayers will be emailed information to create usernames and passwords.

Additionally, the CDTFA announced Claudette Yang is the Department’s first Taxpayer’s Rights Advocate. Ms. Yang’s office is to assist taxpayers resolve matters with the Department and to resolve taxpayer complaints when a taxpayer asserts that its rights have been violated.

If your business requires assistance resolving a matter with the CDTFA or FTB, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

September 18, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Vance, CPA and Katie Nguyen, CPA

In 2009, California established the Qualified Purchaser Program to increase use tax collections. Under the Qualified Purchaser Program, the state mandates businesses register with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (“CDTFA”) for Use Tax if they:

The CDTFA has previously estimated a $2 billion gap between the Use Tax owed by California businesses and what is remitted. However, during the fiscal year 2021-2022, the Program only generated $14.9 million in Use Tax remittances. To address this deficit, the California Legislature passed A.B. 1097, which reduces the registration and reporting threshold from $100,000 to $10,000. It remains to be seen if Gov. Newsom will enact the legislation into law.

If you have questions about whether your business is subject to California’s Qualified Purchaser Program and/or needs to self-assess and remit Use Tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

August 11, 2023

Authored by: Courtney Easterday, MSA and Katerine Velasquez

On July 26, 2023, San Francisco Mayor Breed signed File #230155, enacting the City’s budget for the coming fiscal year. The City’s budget signed by the mayor postpones scheduled increases to the City’s Gross Receipts Tax. Gross Receipts Tax rate increases scheduled to take effect in 2023 are now postponed until 2025. Furthermore, businesses opening locations in the City between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2027, are potentially eligible for a credit against their gross receipts tax liability. In order to qualify for the credit, a business (and affiliated entities) cannot have had a physical location within San Francisco for the three years prior to opening the San Francisco location.

If you have questions about local taxes, including the San Francisco Gross Receipts Tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

August 8, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Spinella and Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA

On July 1st, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) issued information related to sales, use, and excise tax on cannabis and cannabis product deliveries.

For more information on the taxes and tax rates for cannabis and cannabis product deliveries, please visit the CDTFA website.

If you have questions about state and local taxes on cannabis sales, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

July 18, 2023

Authored by: Breea Boylan, CPA and Courtney Easterday, MSA

The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration announced amendments to Tax Regulation 1599, increasing the sales and use tax exemption threshold for bulk sales of bullion and coins. Effective January 1, 2023, the exemption threshold will increase from $1,500 to $2,000. This retroactive change means sales tax applies to retail sales of coins and bullion valued at less than $2,000.

If you have questions about whether your business is obligated to collect and remit sales and use tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

July 7, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Spinella and Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA

On July 3, the California Office of Tax Appeals (“OTA”) upheld the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s (“CDTFA”) assessment of sales tax against K1 Speed Inc. (“K1”). In its assessment, the Department determined that K1’s go-kart sales were rentals of tangible personal property and were not amusements. K1 countered by asserting that its go-cart sales constituted amusements, cost less than $20 per race, and the purchaser was allowed to use the go-kart for less than 24 hours. In upholding the $2.5M assessment, the OTA determined that the total purchase price for the use of the go-karts was greater than $20 – as such, the duration of the rider’s use was irrelevant. Furthermore, the OTA held that riders exercised extensive control over the use of the go-karts. As such, go-kart rentals were more akin to the rental of bicycles or snowboards, which are subject to sales tax as the rental of tangible personal property. As such did not qualify for the amusements exemption that is designed for amusement park or carnival rides, where the vendor retains control over the equipment.

K1 had already petitioned for a rehearing on the matter, and this request was also denied. Absent a redetermination by a higher court, the assessment of additional sales tax against K1 will stand. It is also interesting to note that the assessment is for the period April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2012. If K1 has not started collecting sales tax on its go-kart rentals at some point during the audit or appeals process, the CDTFA will assess additional tax from April 1, 2012, to the earlier of the date K1 started to collect and remit sales tax on go-karts or the current sales tax period.

If you have questions about whether your business is required to collect sales and use tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

May 19, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Spinella and Courtney Easterday, MSA

The Online Merchants Guild has petitioned the US Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, asserting it may pursue a contest in federal court against California’s attempt to collect sales tax from Guild members. The members being represented by Guild had inventory held in a nonaffiliated marketplace facilitator’s in-state warehouse.

The petition asserts:

In the case, the trade association argued that California’s attempts to collect sales tax from its online remote seller members on their sales to in-state residents prior to October 2019 violated Guild members’ rights under the US Constitution and the Internet Tax Freedom Act, given that their limited contacts with California.

For additional information, see: Merchants Guild v. Nicolas Maduros, Director, California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

If you have questions about whether your business is required to collect and remit sales tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

April 21, 2023

Authored by: Breea Boylan, MSA, CPA and Courtney Easterday, MSA

Los Angeles Mayor Bass released her 2023-2024 budget, which reserves the funds collected from Proposition ULA’s recently enacted “Mansion Tax”. Prop. ULA’s tax collections have been reserved in the event the tax is invalidated pursuant to the various legal challenges filed in response to the tax’s enactment.In the event the tax is invalidated, the City will have funds on hand to issue refunds.

Pursuant to County Prop. ULA, effective April 1, 2023, LA County imposes a 4% documentary stamp tax on the sale of residential real estate with a gross sales price between $5 million and $10 million, and a 5.5% documentary stamp tax is imposed on transactions greater than $10 million. As such, effective April 1, 2023, the sale of a home in LA County for $20 million would incur a documentary stamp tax of $1.1 million in addition to other real estate transfer taxes and recording fees. Taxes raised pursuant to Prop. ULA are dedicated to reducing homelessness in the County.

Various taxpayers have challenged the validity of the tax claiming California. One challenge asserts that the California Constitution prohibits localities from imposing documentary stamp taxes for special purposes. A second challenge asserts that the tax violates the equal protection clauses of the California and US Constitutions. While the various challenges were filed prior to the tax’s effective date, no court has issued an injunction prohibiting LA County from collecting the tax. However, if the tax is subsequently invalidated pursuant to any of the various legal challenges, the County would be obligated to issue refunds.

Furthermore, “The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability” Proposition has gathered enough signatures to be placed on the statewide November 2024 ballot. This statewide proposition would require any proposition imposing (or raising) a tax to be approved by 2/3 of the voters and would invalidate any tax proposition adopted after January 1, 2022, that was not approved by 2/3 of the voters. Proposition ULA received 58% approval, and thus would be invalidated if the statewide proposition passes.

March 17, 2023

Authored by: Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA and Jessie Racioppi

On March 1, 2023, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) issued an updated sales, use, and excise tax guide for cannabis businesses. The guide applies to cannabis retailers as well as micro businesses that make retail sales of cannabis and cannabis products. Excise tax is due for retail sales of cannabis and cannabis products made on or after January 1, 2023. The first cannabis excise tax return and the associated payment is due on May 1, 2023. Cannabis retailers are required to register for with the CDTFA for a seller’s permit and a cannabis retailer excise tax permit. The CDTFA Tax Guide for Cannabis Businesses outlines the registration, tax collection, and filing obligations for cannabis retailers.

If you have questions about state excise and sales taxes on cannabis products, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

March 10, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Vance and George Gonzales, MST

Governor Newsom announced on March 2, 2023, that individuals and businesses impacted by recent winter storms may qualify for an extension until October 15, 2023 to file and make certain payments as follows:

Residents and businesses in Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Kings, Lake, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yolo, and Yuba counties who have been affected by severe winter storms, flooding, landslides, and mudslides are eligible for tax relief.

California’s announcement aligns its due dates with Federal relief extended to California taxpayers as updated on February 24, 2023. If you have questions about whether you are entitled to Winter Storm Relief provisions, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

February 10, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Mejia and George Gonzales, MST

On January 30, 2023, the California Franchise Tax Board issued FTB NOTICE-2023-01, explaining the “Analysis of partner’s tax basis capital account” reporting requirements for the California Schedule K-1 on Forms 565 and 568.

For tax years 2021 and 2022, taxpayers filing Forms 565 or 568 are allowed to use the tax basis method as determined under federal law (as stated on the Federal Schedule K-1), or use of the tax basis method established under California law.

Starting in tax year 2023 (and applicable for all subsequent tax years), taxpayers filing Forms 565 or 568 will be required to report the partners’ or members’ capital accounts under the tax basis method defined under California law.

For additional detail, please refer to FTB Notice 2023-01.

If you have questions about your business’ state tax compliance obligations, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 20, 2023

Authored by: Breea Boylan, MSA and George Gonzales, MST

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, the new refundable Foster Youth Tax Credit, provides up to $1,083 credit per eligible individual or up to $2,166 credit for taxpayers filing joint returns. To qualify for this credit, current and/or former foster youth must:

In order to claim the credit, Form FTB 3514 must included with the California personal income tax return.

January 13, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Spinella

The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (“CDTFA”) declared statewide excise and sales and use tax relief for taxpayers affected by this. The relief provisions include an extension of up to three months to file required tax returns and pay the tax as well as penalty and interest abatement for affected taxpayers.

Qualified taxpayers can apply for the tax relief through the CDTFA website. More information can be found on the CDTFA website.

If you have questions about whether your business is eligible for the CDTFA’s California winter storm tax relief, please contact a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 13, 2023

Authored by: Brandon Spinella

The IRS announced comprehensive tax relief provisions for taxpayers affected by California’s winter storms. These relief provisions provide for a May 15, 2023 extended due date for disaster affected taxpayers to file returns.This includes:

For more information about the IRS’ relief provisions for California taxpayers affected by this winter’s storms, please see IRS CA-2023-02 and IRS Alert IR-2023-03.

If you have questions about whether your business is eligible for the IRS’ California winter storm tax relief, please contact a member of the Withum SALT Team.

January 6, 2023

Authored by: Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA and Katerine Velasquez

On January 1, 2023, The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) released information on its excise, sales, and use tax Cannabis Inspection Program. The announcement provides comprehensive guidance for taxpayers engaged in cannabis businesses, including taxpayer’s rights, CDFTA’s routine inspection details, and required tax reporting.

For more information regarding California’s Cannabis taxes, please refer to Publication 552. If you have questions about whether your business is required to collect and remit sales tax, please reach out to a member of the Withum SALT Team.

November 11, 2022

Authored by: Jonathan Weinberg, JD, LLM, Principal

By a nearly 20% margin, Californians rejected Proposition 30 imposing an additional 1.75% tax on individuals making more than $2 million per year. If Proposition 30 had passed, the tax rate on individuals making more than $2 million would have increased from 13.3% to 15.05%. California Proposition 30 was rejected by voters 59.06% to 40.94%.

October 14, 2022

Authored by: Jessie Racioppi

Effective September 29, 2022, settlement claims received by wildfire victims from the 2015 Butte Fire, 2017 North Bay and Thomas Fires, and 2018 Woolsey and Camp Fires are excluded from California taxable income. Taxpayers who qualify for this exclusion include those that owned, resided in, or had a place of business in one of the affected counties, incurred expenses, and received settlements related to the fires. The taxpayer must provide supporting documentation to the California Franchise Tax Board, if requested.

Also enacted, employers with more than 25 employees must continue to provide up to 80 hours of COVID-19 supplemental sick pay to all employees. This mandate was initially set to expire September 30, 2022, but now has been extended to December 31, 2022. Qualified businesses can receive up to $50,000 in Small Business and Nonprofit COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Grants to reimburse them for the cost of the supplemental paid sick leave incurred by employees. If you have questions about how these California changes affect your business, please contact a member of the Withum SALT Team.

October 14, 2022

Authored by: Brandon Vance and Bonnie Susmano, JD, MBA

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) in early 2022 released its 2021 tax forms and instructions for partnerships, Form 565, and limited liability companies (LLC), Form 568. Taxpayers learned that the FTB would be requiring them to report tax basis capital amounts on a California basis rather than the federal tax basis amounts.

The FTB recognized the difficulty this may present for taxpayers and released Notice 2022-01 on March 8, 2022, which allowed taxpayers to report the capital accounts on either a federal or California basis for the 2021 tax year. However, the California tax basis method must be used for the 2022 tax year. California is the first state to mandate a tax basis on the state level.

September 9, 2022

Authored by: Jessie Racioppi and Courtney Easterday, MSA

On Thursday, September 1, 2022, SB-851 was sent to Governor Newsom. The bill addresses the pass-through entity elective tax credit and the other state tax credit for post-2021 tax years. The current California Franchise Tax Board guidelines states that a taxpayer must first reduce their California tax liability by the amount of pass-through entity elective tax credit claimed, thus reducing the credit for taxes paid to other states. SB-851 will allow California resident taxpayers to addback the pass-through entity elective tax credit when computing their California credit for taxes paid to other states.

August 29, 2022

Authored by: Breea Boylan, MSA

On August 17, 2022, the California legislature passed Assembly Bill 2280 which now allows the Controller to establish a program for the voluntary compliance of eligible holders of unclaimed property. Holders that have not reported unclaimed property reports may request to enroll in the program which waives the 12% interest assessed against the holder for non-reporting. In order for the holder to qualify for the interest waiver they must:

A holder is ineligible for the voluntary compliance program if:

Assembly Bill 2280 will be sent to Governor Gavin Newsom for his consideration.

August 29, 2022

Authored by: Breea Boylan, MSA

The California Employment Development Department (EDD) has announced that employers statewide directly affected by the monkeypox outbreak may request up to a two-month extension of time to file their state payroll reports and/or deposit payroll taxes without penalty or interest. In order to qualify for the extension, employers must file a written request with the California EDD within two months from the original delinquent date of the payment or return. Section 1111.5 of the California Unemployment Insurance Code allows for this extension to be granted by the California EDD.

August 19, 2022

Authored by: Kevan Koopaei, CPA and Brandon Spinella

The Wayfair case is starting to encroach itself on income tax for e-retailers. The majority of states have adopted economic nexus principles for income tax. Some of these economic nexus rules have bright line thresholds on the amount of sales derived from sources in the state (i.e., “factor presence”). Other states use a more amorphous “doing business” nexus standard where theoretically $1 worth of sales into the state would be sufficient to create nexus.

While many states have lowered their nexus threshold to merely deriving receipts from sources within the state, P.L. 86-272, protected many retailers from state income taxes. However, In July 2020, the Multistate Tax Commission issued its restatement on when P.L. 86-272 applies in the digital economy. As per the MTC’s restatement, a number of activities that would have previously been considered protected may now break P.L. 86-272 protection. Examples of digital activities that may break P.L. 86-272 protection include providing customer support via online chat tools, extended warranty plans, advertising job openings, accepting job applications through the Company website, putting specific types of cookies into customer’s devices, and providing remote repairs and automatic device updates. California and New York have already indicated that they are adopting the MTC’s restatement, and other states are sure to follow. This will substantially curtail retailers’ ability to claim P.L. 86-272 protection.

For questions about whether your business may be protected under P.L. 86-272, please contact the Withum SALT Team.

August 12, 2022

Authored by: George Gonzales, MST and Katerine Velasquez

The FTB has acknowledged that due to systemwide issues with the 2022 Form 3893, Passthrough Entity Elective Tax Payment Voucher, June 2022 passthrough entity elective tax prepayments were incorrectly applied to the 2021 tax year resulting in erroneous refunds of these payments. This issue affects the passthrough elective tax election for 2022 as the requirement for taxpayers to have a valid election must remit payment of the lesser of $1,000 or 50% of the 2021 passthrough entity elective tax due by June 15, 2022. The FTB is allowing taxpayers to return these erroneous refunds to preserve their right to make the election.

Although the FTB has not indicated a specific deadline to return these refunds, we recommend that taxpayers who received a refund from the FTB contact Withum as soon as possible and receive advice for the next steps to avoid problems making 2022 passthrough entity tax elections. The method for returning a payment depends on how the payment was refunded and whether or not the check has been cashed. Taxpayers are advised to not cash checks from the FTB related to PTET refunds.

July 29, 2022

Authored by: Brandon Vance and Bonnie Susmano,JD, MBA

On July 20^th, the California Tax Board released information on the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan forgiveness for corporate income and individual income tax purposes, as well as Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF), and Shuttered Venue Operator (SVO) grant income exclusions. Some information provided includes:

More information can be found online at the California Franchise Tax Boards website.

July 22, 2022

The California Controller has announced an increase in the refund rate for all gasoline purchased from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023. The refund rate for all gas increased to $0.539 per gallon from $0.511 per gallon. This refund opportunity is for claimants who purchase gasoline in the State of California for off-highway, paratransit, export, or blended fuel (E-85) purposes. The Gasoline Tax Refund Claim form is Form SCGR-1. The State Controller’s Office is accepting electronic submissions of Gasoline Tax Refund claims via email to the following email address [email protected]. In addition, the revised form allows for either an original or electronic signature. The Form SCGR-1 and all related schedules must be completed and submitted to the State Controller’s Office within three years from the gasoline purchase date.

July 8, 2022

On June 30, 2022, California will provide income tax credits for cannabis businesses. For tax years beginning January 1, 2023 through and before January 1, 2028, qualified licensed commercial cannabis businesses may receive a credit equal to 25% of the total amount of qualified expenditures in the taxable year, capped at $250,000.

In order to claim the credit:

May 13, 2022

United to House LA submitted documents to show they have collected 98,171 signatures for a ballot proposal to increase the real estate transfer tax on homes selling for more than $5 million. The proposal estimates it would generate $8 billion over 10 years and these funds would be dedicated to expanding and maintaining the availability of affordable housing in the LA area. The current real estate transfer tax rate on residential real estate is currently 0.45%. Pursuant to the ballot initiative, the real estate transfer tax would increase to 4% for real estate selling for more than $5 million and less than $10 million and the rate would increase to 5.5% tax on property selling for more than $10 million.

The California Franchise Tax Board and the New York Department of Taxation have issued a technical memorandum and a draft regulation respectively. The documents put out by the states revise their interpretation of P.L. 86-272.P.L. 86-272 prohibits states and localities from imposing income taxes on remote businesses if their only activity with the state is soliciting sales of tangible personal property. The Multistate Tax Commission recently reinterpreted P.L. 86-272, stating that businesses interacting with customers via a website or an app are engaging in unprotected business activities within the customer’s state in a variety of scenarios, and thus no longer qualify for P.L. 86-272 protection. Both California and New York are using this reinterpretation of P.L. 86-272 to modify their respective stances on when businesses can claim P.L. 86-272 protection. Furthermore, California has indicated that its revised interpretation of P.L. 86-272 can be applied retroactively. New York is also considering a retroactive application of its revised interpretation of P.L. 86-272. For more information, please see California’s Technical Memorandum, and New York’s Draft Regulation. If you have questions about whether your business may still be protected under P.L. 86-272, please contact a member of the Withum SALT Team.

March 25, 2022

Pursuant to P.L. 117-2, the Federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 broadens the EITC requirements for 2021 and future years to include married/registered domestic partner (RDP) not filing a joint return under certain circumstances. Specifically, the law provides the following:

“A Spouse/RDP can claim the CalEITC if married, not filing a joint return for the taxable year, had a qualifying child who lived with the spouse/RDP for more than half of the tax year, andeitherof the following apply:

If a person is married or registered domestic partners filing separately and have already filed their return but did not take the California Earned Income Tax Credit, they can file a superseded return prior to April 18, 2022, wait for a letter from FTB for instructions, or file an amended return.

Furthermore, a spouse/RDP that meets the above requirements may also qualify for the Young Child Tax Credit if the qualifying child was under the age of six at the close of the taxable year.

March 11, 2022

On February 14, 2022, California released Technical Advice Memorandum 2022-01, that provides guidance and examples of activities protected under P.L. 86-272. The TAM takes into account how the economy has changed since P.L. 86-272 was enacted due to technological advancements.

The Franchise Tax Board indicated businesses operations similar to the following fact patterns are not protected under P.L. 86-272:

Additional fact patterns can be found in the TAM 2022-01 here: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/tax-pros/law/technical-advice-memorandums/2022-01.pdf.

February 11, 2022

On February 9, 2022, California’s Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 113 providing the much-anticipated legislative fix for businesses electing the Pass-Through Entity (“PTE”) tax. Previously, under A.B. 50, PTE credit passed through to qualified taxpayers could not reduce the net income tax below the tentative minimum tax (“TMT”). Retroactive for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2021, S.B. 113 provides technical corrections allowing for the PTE credit to reduce net income tax below TMT. Additionally, the legislation:

Further, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, the bill ends the temporary suspension of net operating losses (“NOLs”) and eliminates the $5 million business credit limit previously enacted under California A.B. 85.

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2019, S.B. 113, in modified conformity with the American Rescue Plan Act, excludes from gross income any amount received in the form of a federal restaurant revitalization grant and adopts, with exceptions, prohibiting any reduction in tax deductions, reductions in tax attributes, and denials of basis adjustments based on the exclusion from gross income.

For businesses considering making a PTE tax election, in many states PTE elections are yielding significant tax benefits. PTE election decision making requires modeling and analysis of the specific facts and circumstances to weigh the potential benefits along with the risks in determining the right course of action.

February 4, 2022

Per Assembly Bill 466, the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) is now authorized to share unclaimed property information with the State Controller’s Office. Previously, the Franchise Tax Board was prohibited from sharing taxpayer information with the State Controller’s office.

Pursuant to AB 466, the FTB has added questions to the 2021 business tax returns. These questions include whether the business has previously filed an unclaimed property report with the Controller’s Office, the date the report was filed, and the amount of unclaimed property remitted.

Currently, the Controller’s Office may only use the information obtained from the FTB to educate taxpayers that are not in compliance with escheat laws. However, taxpayers should consider the aggressiveness of California Franchise Tax Board and should be aware of the increased risk of a possible audit.

November 10, 2021

California legislation AB-1402 extends the registration and filing requirements related to marketplace facilitators that goes beyond the Department’s existing laws requiring marketplace facilitators to register, collect, and remit sales and use taxes with the department. Effective January 1, 2022, marketplace facilitators are required to register, collect, and remit lead-acid battery recycling fees, lumber products assessment, electronic waste recycling fee, and tire fees with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. Excluded from this requirement are local prepaid mobile telephony surcharges.

Starting November 1, 2021, small business employers can apply for the 2021 Main Street Small Business Tax Credit to obtain financial relief due to COVID-19. Small businesses can utilize this credit to offset their income or sales and use taxes when they file their returns. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (“CDTFA”) will accept online applications through November 30, 2021.

Qualifications

A small business may qualify for the credit if it:

Small businesses may receive up to $1,000 per additional net qualifying employee, not to exceed $150,000. [See https://www.cdtfa.ca.gov/industry/main-street-small-business-tax-credit-II-AB150.htm]

November 4, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) issued a letter ruling setting out the FTB’s position on when a pass-through holding company is unitary with other pass-through entities in a number of different scenarios. Unlike the analysis for incorporated entities, the FTB’s unitary analysis for pass-through entities requires examining additional, non-traditional factors. Furthermore, when the holding company does not have any operations of its own, the weighting of the non-traditional factors in the analysis is enhanced. The second consideration is if the business structure creates unity. For example, if a holding company functions as a focal point or conduit for operating the business, then the affiliated entities will be considered unitary. In contrast, if the holding company was clearly formed for investment purposes, then there is no unity. The third scenario is if the holding company is associated with one operating business, then the holding company is not unitary with its parent or the operating company. Finally, unlike corporate holding companies, pass-through holding companies may not need to own a controlling interest in the operating company in order to be considered unitary with the operating company. Even when a pass-through holding company owns less than 50% of the operating entity, the FTB will still examine whether there are indications of a unitary relationship in making its determination.

September 23, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) issued guidance about the newly enacted elective pass-through entity tax (PTE) effective January 1, 2021, to January 1, 2026. [see A.B. 150(2021)] The FTB discusses how certain qualifying PTEs may annually elect to pay this entity-level state tax on income. In return, qualifying taxpayers receive credit for their share of the entity level, ultimately reducing their California personal income tax.

Who Qualifies?

A “qualified taxpayer” can be individuals, fiduciaries, estates, or trusts subject to California personal income tax and must be a partner, member, or shareholder of a qualified electing entity. Note that a taxpayer must approve of having their pro-rate share of the qualified income of the electing qualified PTE.

PTE Election

A qualified taxpayer can make an annual election on a timely filed tax return. However, once the election is made, it is irrevocable for that year and is binding on all PTE partners, shareholders, and members.

For the 2021 tax year, the election must be made when the tax return is filed. Beginning January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2025, the qualifying taxpayer must make the election when the tax return for the taxable year is filed and remit payment by June 15^th. Otherwise, the qualifying taxpayer cannot make the PTE election.

Due Dates

The elective tax must be paid by the due date of the original tax return. However, for the 2022 to 2025 tax years, the first payment of $1,000 or 50% of the elective tax paid in the prior taxable year, whichever is greater, is due by June 15^th of the taxable year of the election. The remaining amount must be paid by the due date of the original return without regard to extensions.

PTE Calculation

Each qualified shareholder’s distributive share of income subject to California personal income tax is subject to tax at 9.3%. Please note that some of California’s personal income tax brackets are lower and some are higher than the PTE rate. As such, some taxpayers may be over-paid and others underpaid as a result of making a PTE election. Please note that overpayments resulting from a PTE election are not refundable – taxpayers who are overpaid as a result of a PTE election may carry forward the unused credit for five (5) years.

September 16, 2021

Due to the California wildfires, the California Franchise Tax Board has extended the deadline to file California 2020 income tax returns, which would have been due between July 14, 2021 through November 15, 2021. The deadline extension to November 15, 2021 is granted to Taxpayers in declared disaster areas. The filings included in this extension are: Individual filers who previously claimed an October 15^th extension (strictly for the return filing and not the tax payment, as the tax payments were due on May 17, 2021), business entity filings due between the period of July 14, 2021 through November 15, 2021, and quarterly estimated tax payments due during the extension period.

June 28, 2021

The CDTFA recently issued guidance for small businesses concerning relief payment plans for sales tax due to Covid-19. Small businesses with annual taxable sales of less than $5 million can obtain a 12-month, interest-free payment plan for up to $50,000 of their sales tax liability. The loan must be paid in full by April 30, 2022, to be eligible for zero interest. The good news is that any business that took advantage of the prior 12-month, interest-free payment plan due July 31, 2021, is eligible to participate in this new 12-month interest-free payment plan. This taxpayer relief is only applicable to sales and uses tax returns due between December 15, 2020, and April 30, 2021. Taxpayers must apply for this payment plan no later than August 16, 2021, through their CDFTA online account.

Governor Newson recently signed Assembly Bill 150, which allows for an elective pass-through entity tax and amends and broadens the small business hiring credit (aka the Main Street Small Business Tax Credit). The law enacts the Small Business Relief Act, which permits a qualifying entity doing business in the state to annually elect to pay an elective tax based upon its qualified net income computed at the rate of 9.3%. The qualified entity must be doing business in California and is required to file either an S-Corp, Limited Liability Company, or Partnership tax return for taxable years beginning January 1, 2021, through January 1, 2026. A qualified entity is defined as an entity that is taxed as a partnership or S-corporation. The entity’s partners, shareholders, or members in the taxable year of election are exclusively corporations or taxpayers (not partnerships). The entity is not a publicly traded partnership or an entity permitted/required to be part of a combined reporting group. The election is irrevocable and is made on the original, timely filed return for that taxable year.

June 22, 2021

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a budget trailer bill that creates an elective pass-through entity tax. For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2021, and before January 1, 2026, qualified entity doing business in California can make an annual, irrevocable election to pay a pass-through entity tax similar to the New York PTET. The tax is computed at the rate of 9.3% for the taxable year for which the election is made.

Entities eligible to make the California PTET election include entities taxed as partnerships (except publicly traded partnerships) and S Corporations. This elective tax is in addition to, and not in place of, any other tax required to be paid under California’s personal income tax or corporation tax laws. As such, owners of pass-through entities making the election claim a credit for their share of the pass-through entity’s PTE tax on their respective returns. If this results in an overpayment, excess credit may be carried forward for five (5) years.

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2021, and before January 1, 2022, the elective tax is due and payable on or before the due date of the original return that the entity is required to file, without regard to any extension of time for filing the return, for the taxable year of the extension. For future tax years, the Department will establish new due dates for making the election and payment of the tax.

The concept of pass-through entity tax is still fairly new feel free to read Withum’s discussion of the rapid changing landscape of PTET’s.

June 18, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) has issued a 45-day notice of amendments to the draft language of the proposed regulation at California Code of Regulations, Title 18, Section 18662-7,Domestic Pass-Through Entity Withholding(Proposed Regulation), and proposed amendments to the final regulations at Sections 18662-0 through 18662-6 and 18662-8 (Final Regulations)(together, the “Proposed Regulations”). The Proposed Regulations include, among other things, measures to: add language relating to domestic pass-through entity withholding; amend provisions on foreign partner withholding to more closely reflect the federal language; and specify withholding requirements for trusts and estates. The purpose of the notice is to elicit comments on the newly revised Proposed Regulations. Written comments regarding the Proposed Regulations will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on July 23, 2021. All inquiries and comments regarding the notice should be directed to Leah Thyberg of the FTB whose contact information is set forth in the notice.

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) has updated its Golden State Stimulus webpage. Among other things, the updated webpage refers to the governor’s proposal to add and expand stimulus payments for more Californians and notes that these additional payments are not yet available and are pending legislative action; and expands the discussion of when recipients will receive their payments. Revisions have also been made to the following taxpayer assistance sections: “How to get your payment”; “What to do” for a taxpayer who filed a 2020 return but did not claim a California earned income tax credit for which the taxpayer is eligible; and “Need some help?” For more information, please visit the FTB website on this topic.

June 9, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) has replaced the webpage it recently created for Assembly Bill 80 and the tax treatment of forgiven loans with a new webpage. After providing an overview of the bill, the webpage covers three topics: (1) income, (2) expenses, and (3) “What to Do” (i.e., steps taxpayers need to take to amend returns to claim expenses made deductible under A80 that were not previously deducted).

May 26, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) has created a webpage to provide guidance on the State tax treatment of forgiven loans. More specifically, the website will address three topics: (1) the exclusion from gross income for loans that are forgiven under California’s conformity to federal provisions such as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) advance grant amounts; (2) expenses paid for with for PPP loans and EIDL advance grants that were forgiven; and (3) California’s conformity, with modifications, to four federal acts—the CARES (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security) Act, the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, the Paycheck Program Flexibility Act of 2020, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021—and the date of California’s conformity to each of them.

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) will hold a sixth interested parties meeting (“IPM”) to solicit public input regarding additional proposed amendments to California’s market-based rules regulation (Cal. Code Regs. Title 18 § 25136-2). The sixth IPM will be held telephonically on Friday, June 4, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. To attend, interested parties need to RSVP to the FTB by May 28, 2021, at the email address set forth in the notice. Instructions on how to participate in the sixth IPM are set forth in the notice as well. The proposed amendments to be discussed include: added definitions of asset management services and of professional services; examples to be included in the regulation; addition of a special rule for certain professional services; and a change to the applicability date (to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2023).

May 13, 2021

Taxpayers were residents (and domiciliaries) of California before 2008. On July 18, 2008, Taxpayers sold their shares in a corporation and did not pay California tax on the gain from that sale because they considered themselves nonresidents as of February 26, 2008 (the date on which they rented an apartment in Henderson, Nevada). The California Office of Tax Appeals (OTA)—affirming the Franchise Tax Board’s (FTB’s) proposed assessment of additional taxes against the Taxpayers—determined that even though Taxpayers took some steps to evidence California was not their domicile in renting the Nevada apartment, they did not adopt a new permanent home in doing so (the apartment was part of their plan to find a new permanent home, but was not the actual move to a new residence with the intent to remain there permanently). Further, because the taxpayers were California domiciliaries and physically in the State for a majority of the time leading up to and on July 18, 2008, their 28-day presence in Nevada (date they had moved out of California to the date of the stock sale) did not outweigh the prior California residency/domicile contacts so as to greater a greater connection to another state. Therefore, the Taxpayers were California residents on the date of the stock sale, and owed personal income tax on the gain on the transaction.

May 5, 2021

The California State Controller and Franchise Tax Board (FTB) announced an extension to May 17, 2021, for individual California taxpayers to claim a refund for tax year 2016. Taxpayers normally have four years to file a claim for a state tax refund in California. Tax year 2016 state income tax returns were due in 2017, so the standard four-year statute of limitations for claiming a refund would have expired on April 15 of this year. With the postponement, individual taxpayers who are due a refund may now file their return for the 2016 tax year no later than May 17, 2021, to claim their money. Similarly, theInternal Revenue Service(IRS) recently announced an extension to May 17 for individual taxpayers who are due a refund on their tax year 2017 federal income tax returns. The IRS normally has a three-year statute of limitations to file a claim for a federal tax refund. Taxpayers claiming a state refund for previous tax years can find Form 540 on FTB’sforms locatorfor the applicable tax year.

In November 2016, California voters approved Proposition 56, which included electronic cigarettes in the definition of other tobacco products (“OTPs”). Effective April 6, 2021, California has amended State regulation on wholesale cost of tobacco products (Title 18, Section 4076): which now: defines the terms “electronic cigarettes,” “sold in combination with,” and “tobacco products”; clarifies the scope of manufacturing costs in determining the wholesale cost of tobacco for a manufacturer or an importer that is also a distributor; and provide examples of items that are and are not considered tobacco products. Further, California has also adopted a Regulation on tobacco product manufacturers (Title 18, Section 4077), which among other things: defines the term “tobacco product manufacturer”; provides that a retailer who mixes, blends, or combines a tobacco product that is not in a form suitable for human consumption, such as liquid nicotine, and other ingredients and components to make a product that is suitable for human consumption is a tobacco product manufacturer; and provides that a retailer who is not a licensed manufacturer, importer, or distributor must purchase its tobacco products from a licensed tobacco products distributor or wholesaler. If you sell OTPs in California and have questions about local taxation issues, please reach out to Withum’s State and Local Tax Group.

March 23, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) has announced that California will extend the state tax filing and payment deadline for 2020 returns for individuals to May 17, 2021. This extension does not apply to estimated tax payments due on April 15, 2021. This relief is available to all individual California taxpayers (including those who file composite returns) without the need for them to file a request with or contact the FTB. The FTB also has created a FAQs regarding the extension, 2020 tax year extension to file and pay (individual) . The California extension is similar to the federal tax filing and payment deadline extension the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department announced on March 17, 2021. In IR:2021-59 , they announced that the federal income tax filing and payment due date for individuals for the 2020 tax year will be automatically extended from April 15, 2021, to May 17, 2021, and that this relief does not apply to estimated tax payments that are due on April 15, 2021, which remain due on April 15, 2021. ( News, Filing and Payment Extension for Individuals, California Franchise Tax Board Homepage, 03/17/2021 ; California FTB News Release No. 03/19/2021, 03/19/2021.)

March 17, 2021

The California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) voted to proceed with adopting certain proposed amendments to California Code of Regulations, Title 18, section 25137 (Regulation); which permits a taxpayer to petition for the use of an alternative apportionment method, if the standard allocation and apportionment provisions do not fairly reflect the extent of a taxpayer’s business activity in California. There was limited formal guidance as to how such petitions were to be considered by the FTB, so the proposed amendments are aimed at addressing that issue.

May 2, 2020

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) provided some preliminary information regarding California’s conformity and nonconformity to the CARES Act. California generally conforms to the pension-related items of the Act, such as early withdrawal penalty and minimum distribution rule changes. However, California does not automatically adapt to the modifications made concerning loans from a qualified retirement account. California does not conform to other changes made by the CARES Act, including those related to loan forgiveness compared to the paycheck protection program. Furthermore, California does not conform to the provisions regarding net operating loss carrybacks, charitable contributions, student loan forgiveness, business interest limitations, and the prior year alternative minimum tax liability for corporations. The FTB will issue further guidance as it completes its analysis of the CARES Act.

Source: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/about-ftb/newsroom/tax-news/may-2020/californias-conformity-with-the-federal-cares-act.html

March 20, 2020

Specific info on type of filing and deadlines can be found on the State of California Franchise Tax Board site here.

This relief includes changes to the various tax filing and payment deadlines that occur on March 15, 2020, through June 15, 2020, to July 15, 2020. “This includes:

Taxpayers claiming COVID-19 relief should write the name of the state of emergency (for example, COVID-19) in black ink at the top of their tax return to notify FTB of the extension period provided by the relief. If taxpayers are e-filing, they should follow the software instructions to enter disaster information.

In addition, the FTB will also waive interest and any late filing or late payment penalties that would normally apply.

More on Taxes and the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Disclaimer: Please note this is the information that is readily available at this time, it is subject to change so please consult your Withum tax advisor.

November 2019

The economic nexus thresholds for determining if a taxpayer is doing business in California for the 2019 taxable year were released by the California Franchise Tax Board. A taxpayer is considered to be doing business in California if it is organized or commercially domiciled in California; its sales in California exceed a threshold amount or 25% of its total sales; its real property and tangible personal property in California exceed a threshold amount or 25% of its total real property and tangible personal property; or the amount paid in California by the taxpayer for compensation exceeds a threshold amount or 25% of the total compensation paid by the taxpayer. The threshold values for the 2019 tax year are as follows: sales, $601,967; property, $60,197; and compensation, $60,197. (Memorandum on Indexing, Personal Income Tax Law, 2019 Tax Year, California Franchise Tax Board, 08/27/2019.)

April 2, 2020

The City of L.A. is offering emergency micro-loans between $5,000 and $50,000 to small businesses affected by the coronavirus.

Source: https://laist.com/2020/03/23/where_to_get_financial_assistance_food_and_more_during_the_coronavirus.php

April 2, 2020

Due to the disruptions caused by COVID-19 to the small business community, the COVID-19 Small Business Resiliency Fund was created. It allows impacted small business owners to access up to $10,000 for employee salaries and rent. This program is administered in partnership with Northeast Community Federal Credit Union.

To be eligible for the COVID-19 Small Businesses Resiliency Fund, small businesses must:

Applications must be completed and submitted via email to [email protected] or they can be mailed or delivered to:
Attn: Judy Lee – COVID 19 Small Business Resiliency Fund
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PL. Rm# 448
San Francisco, CA 94102

Please review the application for all needed documents to be submitted. In addition, the following will be required:

Source: https://oewd.org/covid-19-small-business-resiliency-fund

Disclaimer: Please note that this information is readily available at this time and is subject to change, so please consult your Withum tax advisor.