But doing so often comes at a cost. Here are four tax mistakes that contractors commonly make, some that can leave serious money on the table – or worse, land you in trouble with the tax authorities.
With the signing into law of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act late last year, there are two opportunities to decrease taxable income by a significant amount through depreciation. Both were made permanent and retroactive to January 1, 2015 by the new law.
One tax provision – Section 179 – allows for an immediate tax depreciation deduction of the entire cost of equipment and machinery in the year it is placed into service. Although not all property, plant and equipment purchases are included, all construction equipment and machinery purchases are allowed. Total property, plant and equipment purchases must be less than $2 million in order to receive the full depreciation benefit of $500,000. Anything over $2 million in purchases is a dollar-for-dollar decrease in section 179 tax depreciation expense.
Another tax benefit that was extended through 2019 with the passage of the PATH Act was the Section 168k or “bonus depreciation” provision. This allows for an immediate 50% tax depreciation expense in the year of purchase on certain property, plant and equipment purchases.
Many contractors miss out on this one. Either they are unaware that it exists, or are unsure if they qualify for it. But the tax savings can be substantial. More valuable than a tax deduction, a tax credit of any kind is a direct decrease of your tax liability.
This particular credit is for federal taxes paid on fuels. The credit applies to various types of fuels, but the two that normally pertain to contractors are 1) the off-highway business use of gasoline in machinery and trucks, and 2) the use of undyed diesel fuel. To take advantage of the fuel credit, your company’s use of these two types of fuels should be tracked throughout the year. The credit is based on total number of gallons used and can range from 18 – 25 cents per gallon.
“DPAD” is a little-known method to decrease taxable income that doesn’t pertain to all industries; however construction companies are one of the few that do often benefit. The deduction is based on 9% of “qualified production activities income” from U.S. based operations.
To make sure the credit is taken accurately, it is generally a good idea to invest some effort ahead of time to have the proper cost accounting mechanisms in place. These will help you distinguish between qualified and non-qualified production activities. Proper tracking of revenue from various construction services (and the expenses that go along with it) is critical. If the deduction is taken on non-qualified activities, a restatement of taxable income may be required in future years, and the additional taxes due may also be subject to penalties and interest.
Should the people work on your jobs be issued a w-2 or a 1099? This question causes confusion for employers across the board, but especially for those in the construction trades. Many contractors would understandably like the answer to be the latter in order to avoid paying the employer portion of taxes, unemployment insurance and w-2 filings, costs which when combined can approach 20% of wages.
Unfortunately, the decision is not based on what the employer would like to save or what the employer believes the person may be. The decision must be made according to (among other things) who has “control” of the employee or independent contractor for the work that the worker is performing. A 1099 employee (independent contractor) has control over the work they do. They are hired independently from other employees of a company to perform a specific job, and they – not the employer – control the completion of that task.
Still, some companies decide to classify what should be a w-2 employee as a 1099 employee under the mistaken belief that the consequences for misclassification are minimal. Not true. If an employee qualifies as a w-2 employee by law but is not paid that way, the penalties for the improper filing can run into the hundreds and sometimes thousands of dollars – per employee.
Although the up-front cost savings of issuing a 1099 rather than a w-2 is certainly tempting, the potential penalties in the long run – including increased scrutiny by federal and state tax authorities – are just not worth the risk. That’s why it pays to take the correct steps at the beginning of a worker’s engagement with your company to ensure that he or she is classified properly.