Articles 4 min read

Time for Importers to Take Action: April 20 Starts the IEEPA Tariffs Refund Process

Key Takeaways

Starting April 20, any importers that paid IEEPA tariffs may file claims for refunds in the CAPE system.

CBP has completed the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (“CAPE”) system, found in its ACE electronic customs declaration system.

Importers and authorized customs brokers should anticipate that valid IEEPA refunds will generally be issued within 60-90 days following acceptance of the CAPE Declaration.

It’s finally time for importers to take the first step in claiming IEEPA tariff refunds. This long-awaited move forward comes after the U.S. Supreme Court deemed IEEPA tariffs imposed by the president unconstitutional and the Court of International Trade issued a ruling for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to refund duties imposed under IEEPA tariffs to Importers of Record.

CBP has completed the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (“CAPE”) system, found in its ACE electronic customs declaration system. The process is now clear, CBP has issued instructions and the mystery of what a “Declaration” is has been solved. Essentially, importers need to add just one column of information – entry numbers – into the CAPE system in a .csv (not .xls) format. CBP will need 60-90 days to get through the remaining –six steps in the process before issuing electronic refunds. There are phases in how these refunds will be processed, with the unliquidated and newly (within 80 days) liquidated entries taking priority.

Additional Information:

global trade and tariff

Navigate New Global Trade and Tariff Environment

Increasing tariffs signify a substantial shift in global trade policy. Withum can assist your business in creating an actionable plan to drive decision-making using our proprietary scenario modeling tool and our expertise in global trade, supply chain, transfer pricing and tariffs.

Get Assessment

Consult with your customs brokers or attorneys to understand if there is the possibility to change the status of some of these excluded entries, for example, if removing the open protest will move them to Phase 1 refund status. There is an expectation for a Phase 2 refund process, but CBP has not provided a timeline or procedure yet for addressing these entries through the CAPE system.

As you navigate this process, here are some resources that can help:

 

Withum plus signs.

Have Questions or Need Guidance?

For more information on this topic, please contact a member of our Global Transfer Pricing Services Team.

Contact Us

Related Insights

Read more
Tax Planning Concept: Businessman Arranging Wooden Blocks with Financial Icons and TAX Text Representing Corporate Finance and Growth Strategy
Why Global Structuring and Transfer Pricing Matter for Life Sciences Companies 

The life sciences industry is characterized by high-value intellectual property (“IP”), extensive research and development (R&D), complex regulatory environments, and global supply chains. Life sciences companies are increasingly global from day one where R&D is performed in one country, clinical trials in others, IP held centrally, and manufacturing and commercialization is performed elsewhere. These unique attributes create opportunity, but it also creates tax risk if global structuring and transfer pricing are not…

Read more
tariff paperwork
Recent Tariff Developments – Status of IEEPA Refunds and Fresh Tariffs Proposed by the Trump Administration

As U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) begins issuing billions in IEEPA tariff refunds, new and expanded tariff proposals from the Trump administration are reshaping the trade landscape and introducing additional compliance considerations for importers. Latest CBP Filing Declares $20.6 Billion of Tariff Refunds on the Way to Importers About $20.6 billion in tariff refunds…

Read more
a globe representing global trade.
CIT Rules Section 122 Tariffs Unlawful – Yet Most Importers Still Affected

On May 7, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled against the imposition of 10% temporary global tariffs by the administration under Section 122 of the Trade Act 1974 by calling it “unlawful.” In a split 2-1 decision, the court found that the administration failed to meet the strict legal requirements of Section…