Challenge: ~$745K Microsoft spend with limited license visibility.
Impact: Identified $122K in annual savings (16%) within 9 business days.

My colleague, Andrea Mondello, recently published two posts worth reading if you’re navigating AI adoption right now. One makes the case that data quality issues, not AI itself, are what’s holding organizations back. The other draws on lessons from enterprise AI deployments to help mid-market companies avoid the costly mistakes that larger organizations have already made.
Both posts share a common thread: moving too quickly, without the right foundation, tends to create expensive problems that take years to unwind. That same principle applies directly to Microsoft licensing.
When organizations running on Microsoft start an AI initiative, Microsoft 365 Copilot is the first purchase they make. At $25.5 per user per month (with the current promo available until 06/30/26), it’s a meaningful line item. Like many licensing decisions, this one is sometimes made under pressure, without a clear picture of how many existing licenses have been allocated and how many of those are actively being used.
As a Microsoft Cloud Solutions Provider (CSP) Direct reseller, we see this pattern regularly across most products. A company’s Microsoft spend has grown over time through a series of individual decisions: a new product here, extra seats there, a subscription that made sense two years ago but hasn’t been reviewed since. Some employees have left the company, but their licenses have not been allocated to others. By the time someone asks whether the spend is justified, it’s already embedded in the budget and hard to question. We review this as part of being your CSP reseller, in an effort to save you as much money as possible.
This is a licensing management problem, and it has a practical solution, which as a CSP, we focus on with our CSP customers.
One of the additional service offerings we have at Withum is Software Cost Optimization (SCO). SCO helps companies reduce their annual software spend by 10% to 30% on their most expensive software. We have different variations of this offering, including one that covers only Microsoft spend. SCO is a focused engagement, not a major project. Think of this as a Microsoft license audit – an objective review of how licenses are being used versus what’s actually needed. For the Microsoft-only version, it requires approximately four hours from a Microsoft Global Admin and 30 minutes for a licensing decision maker to review the results. Turnaround time is typically two to six business days. We typically find between 10% and 30% in savings.
For our Microsoft CSP customers, this review is delivered annually as part of the relationship. We strongly believe that being a CSP reseller should not be about profiting from the margins we earn from reselling the software. We discount and use any margins to continue supporting the customer and provide ongoing licensing guidance. Ultimately, we view CSP as a way to establish trusted relationships through supporting ongoing Microsoft license management and earn the opportunity to support broader services over time. That means focusing on what customers actually need – not selling more licenses than necessary.
What the SCO review identifies:
Reduce unnecessary software spend and improve governance and control over renewals and software license management. Learn more about our Software Cost Optimization (SCO) Consulting Services.
Across our client base, we typically find opportunities to reduce Microsoft license costs by 10% to 30% of annual Microsoft spend. For IT leaders who are being asked to reduce costs without disrupting operations, those are defensible, board-ready numbers.
Challenge: ~$745K Microsoft spend with limited license visibility.
Impact: Identified $122K in annual savings (16%) within 9 business days.
Challenge: ~$670K Microsoft spend with limited cost governance.
Impact: Identified $200K in annual savings (30%) within 20 business days.
The SCO review tells you what you should be paying for based on actual usage. The next challenge is keeping licensing aligned over time as needs change. Maintaining that alignment over time is where the right CSP relationship can make a meaningful difference.
Withum has been a Microsoft CSP since 2015, the year the program launched. Clients who purchase Microsoft subscriptions through Withum receive:
We would rather help you spend less on the right licenses than help you spend more on the wrong ones.
Whether you are planning a Copilot deployment, approaching a renewal or simply want a clearer view of your Microsoft spend, it may be worth a quick review.
This post is part of an ongoing conversation about responsible technology adoption. For more on the AI governance and data readiness topics referenced above, visit withum.ai.
Reach out to learn more about Withum’s Microsoft CSP program or to schedule a Software Cost Optimization discussion.
The announcement on May 21, 2026, that Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify are partnering on a new AI-powered music initiative is one of the latest advancements at the intersection of artificial intelligence and the music industry. And yet, something about it strongly echoes a past deal between the two, when they also joined forces…
When someone says, “just build it in Power Apps,” the next question should always be: which one? Power Apps isn’t a single tool. It’s four different app types, each built for a different audience, a different data scale and a different level of technical skill. Picking the wrong app costs real time and money. This guide helps you pick the right one before you start…
In an industry where profit margins are often measured in single digits, small missteps in estimating, scheduling or cost control can determine whether a project succeeds or fails. Companies that integrate robust data analysis into their operations frequently realize competitive advantages. Data analytics help create more efficient operations by automating reporting, flagging anomalies, and streamlining…