Articles 4 min read

Is It Time for a Third-Party Administrator “Check- Up” for Self-Insured Employers?

Many employers are utilizing the self-insurance method and hiring a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) under an Administrative Services Only (ASO) contract to process their claims. These organizations have determined that self-insurance is cost effective as insurers build in higher profit margins for fully insured products, partly reflecting the actuarial risk they are taking for higher-than-expected healthcare costs.

Since TPA’s are processing employers’ self-insured healthcare claims totaling millions of dollars, every employer needs to mitigate this risk and perform a “check-up” of their TPA’s claims adjudication system. It is imperative that self-insured employers develop and implement a monitoring system of their TPA. The monitoring should include an audit which offers an unbiased view on the accuracy of the claims payment process and verifies a TPA’s self-reported results.

Risk Mitigation Strategy

The following are reasons why an employer should audit a TPA or an Insurer under an ASO contract:

Typical Audit Process

A typical TPA audit process includes the following components:

Typical Errors

Typical errors discovered during an audit include but are not limited to the following:

In order to monitor self-insured employers’ healthcare costs, TPA audits are consistent with best practices in the industry. There are no hard and fast rules as to the frequency when claims audits should be conducted; it depends upon your comfort level with the administrator and how hands-on you want to be. Best practices indicate that if previous audits have been satisfactory and no significant plan design changes have been made, auditing once every three years is adequate. If an audit has less-than-positive results, then the employer should certainly be considering either conducting audits more frequently or focusing on specific areas of concern.