Articles 3 min read

IRS Announces Crucial Updates on the ERC

As of March 20, 2023, the IRS has published five documents expressing that the employee retention credit (ERC) is rife with fraud because of unscrupulous tax credit shops. See October 19, 2022 (press release); November 7, 2022 (COVID Tax Tip); March 7, 2023 (press release); March 7, 2023 (OPR Memo); March 20, 2023 (IRS adds promoter claims involving the ERC to its Dirty Dozen list of tax scams).

The most recent guidance added tax promoter claims involving the ERC to the IRS’s annual Dirty Dozen list of tax scams. That’s never good. The IRS is actively auditing and conducting criminal investigations into ERC claims and has advised taxpayers multiple times to “think twice” before claiming the ERC.

IRS Doubles Down on ERC Warning to Taxpayers

On March 7, 2023, the IRS issued guidance from its Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). Among other things, the OPR memo reminds tax professionals (TPs) that they must be diligent as to the accuracy of ERC claims and that they should not prepare an original or amended income tax return that claims or perpetuates an improper ERC claim. This means that even if a TP did not prepare or advise the taxpayer on its ERC claim, the TP cannot perpetuate an improper ERC claim by filing an amended income tax return to include in income the amount of the ERC. The OPR memo can be distilled as follows:

It is important that you talk to your tax professional before you consider applying for an ERC. The IRS has already started to aggressively audit ERC claims, some even before they are paid, and has reportedly dedicated more than 300 employment tax auditors to the effort.

We have seen the IRS scrutinize taxpayers’ calculations of gross receipts and the reasons behind a claimed suspension of business operations. Remember that just because a taxpayer had to purchase PPE or require social distancing, it did not necessarily have a partial suspension of business operations. Also, vague and generalized claims of supply chain issues are not enough; they need to be tied to a governmental order that affected a U.S. supplier.