Artificial intelligence has moved from experiment to everyday business tool. As organizations accelerate AI adoption, AI security has become just as important as innovation. Employees now draft communications, analyze data and even write software with AI assistants — often faster than leadership can put guardrails in place. That speed is a genuine competitive advantage, but it also widens the organization’s risk surface in ways traditional controls were never designed to address. Securing AI is no longer optional; it is part of running the business responsibly.
As AI becomes embedded in everyday business processes, organizations must address AI security risks that traditional security programs were not designed to manage.
Every prompt is a potential exit door for sensitive information. Staff may paste source code, client records or trade secrets into tools that retain or train on what they receive. Once data leaves your boundary, you cannot recall it.
Employees adopt free, consumer-grade AI tools without IT’s knowledge, creating Shadow AI that operates outside established security controls. You cannot protect what you cannot see, and unsanctioned tools rarely meet enterprise data, security or retention standards.
AI is confident even when it is wrong. It can produce insecure code, fabricated facts or “hallucinated” software components that attackers are ready to exploit. Output accepted without review becomes tomorrow’s vulnerability.
AI introduces new techniques — such as prompt injection, where malicious instructions hidden in a document or web page hijack the tool, and autonomous “agents” that can take real actions with too much latitude.
Regulators, clients and insurers increasingly expect a named owner, a documented policy and an audit trail for AI use. “The AI did it” is not a defense.
Organizations can reduce AI security risks by implementing practical AI security best practices focused on governance, data protection and oversight.
AI rewards organizations that move quickly — but only those that move securely will keep the trust of their clients and regulators. The goal is not to slow innovation; it is to govern it. Start with clear ownership and policy, protect the data that flows into these tools, hold people accountable for what AI produces and measure as you go. Done well, security becomes the foundation that lets your organization adopt AI with confidence rather than caution.
For more information on this topic, please contact a member of our team.
For small and midsize businesses (SMBs), technology has become fundamental to nearly every part of the business, from serving customers and processing payments to managing data and keeping operations running. Yet many businesses still approach IT reactively, addressing issues when something breaks rather than managing technology as critical business infrastructure. Artificial intelligence is making that…
Similar to other major AI developers, Google has been facing several lawsuits that challenge the tech giant’s alleged use of copyrighted materials to train its AI models. Against that backdrop, Google’s white paper on AI policy, A Pragmatic Approach to AI Governance in America, appears to present a balanced approach to facilitating continued innovation on…
Even in well-run multiemployer plans (“Plans”), oversight gaps can quietly grow over time. In many cases, these gaps are not the result of negligent or disengaged Boards. Rather, they emerge when too much reliance is placed on existing systems, familiarity and routine reduce visibility into how processes actually operate, or technical complexity discourages questions and…
