Article 5 min read

Internal Controls To Prevent and Detect Fraud at Small To Medium-Sized Not-for-Profits

The F word: Fraud. It is infamous in the accounting world and important that it is an “intentional” act. But why does it happen? How does it happen?

The fraud triangle is a famous model in the fraud investigation world and states that fraud can occur when the following 3 elements are present: Pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners releases a report annually entitled “A Report to the Nations”, which can be accessed on their website: ACFE Report.The following are some examples of the findings from the report based on 2,110 cases of occupational fraud examined:

Why Does This Affect Your Not-for-Profit?

Most not-for-profit organizations have budgetary constraints and lack the ability to pay for full-time and robust accounting departments. This creates a strain to implement strong internal controls. Many frauds occur when there are conflicts of interest, lack of segregation of duties, lack of monitoring, and poor control environments. These are often prevalent in small to medium-sized not-for-profit organizations due to a lack of resources. Based on these facts, it is imperative to implement certain layers of internal control to detect and prevent fraud from occurring. We have heard several stories and seen many frauds occur/investigated, especially at smaller to medium-sized organizations, and there are always common themes, the main one being a lack of internal controls.

What Are Some Internal Controls To Think About Implementing?

Although not an all-inclusive list, the following are common internal controls at not-for-profits that can be a low-cost/time investment but also highly effective in detecting and preventing fraud:

Cash Controls

Payroll Controls

Reconciliation Controls

Service Organization Controls

Board Governance and Monitoring

Other

In addition to the above, many not-for-profit organizations outsource certain functions.Outsourcing functions can effectively reduce costs while adding strong segregation of duties and internal controls. If the above is not possible to implement with internal staffing, it is important to consider outsourcing as an option and compare the cost vs. benefit of this route.

Lastly, it is imperative that you perform some layer of fraud risk assessment at least annually and continuously update your internal controls at the Board level.The control environment (tone at the top) is important and if monitoring is taking place, fraud risk will most likely be reduced due to knowing someone is watching.With all internal controls, there is a cost-benefit associated with implementation, but the cost of having no internal controls is much higher than spending time and resources to implement effective internal controls within your organization.