Cybersecurity Awareness Month reinforces the importance of employee awareness and sound security practices. As highlighted in our recent article on cyber risk and the changing threat landscape, organizations face increasingly sophisticated threats. But training and technical safeguards can only go so far without appropriate verification and oversight.
Employees routinely approve financial transactions, manage access to sensitive information and make decisions under tight deadlines. Without clear procedures, fraudulent requests can appear to be part of everyday operations.
For business leaders, effective cybersecurity risk management means focusing on how employees, processes and technology work together to prevent unauthorized activity and protect critical operations.
Many cybersecurity incidents involve familiar business activities: processing payments, updating account information, sharing documents, or granting access to systems. These activities are necessary for day-to-day operations, but they can also create opportunities for fraud or unauthorized access when appropriate safeguards are missing.
Consider an employee who receives an email from a seemingly trusted vendor requesting a change to banking information. The message includes familiar business details that make the request appear legitimate. This type of business email compromise can result in significant financial losses without appropriate verification.
If the employee can update payment information based solely on that email, the organization is relying on the employee to recognize the fraud. Requiring confirmation through an established contact method and secondary approval for certain changes can reduce that exposure.
Similar risks arise in other routine business activities, including:
Attackers may impersonate executives or trusted contacts and create a sense of urgency to discourage employees from following normal procedures.
A successful attack in these circumstances may reveal more than an employee’s mistake. It may expose a business process that lacked an appropriate verification step or allowed established controls to be bypassed.
The objective is to support employee judgment with controls that make fraudulent requests more difficult to execute.
Cybersecurity awareness training helps employees recognize potential threats, but recognizing a concern is only part of the process. Employees also need to understand what to do next.
An employee who receives an unusual payment request should know how to verify it. Someone who receives an unexpected authentication prompt should understand when to report it. Employees handling sensitive information should know when additional approval is required before sharing it.
These expectations should be reflected in documented procedures and role-specific training.
Organizations should also make reporting and escalation straightforward. Employees need to know whom to contact, when to stop a transaction or request additional review and what information to provide when reporting suspicious activity.
An employee may hesitate to question a request that appears to come from a senior executive, particularly when it is marked urgent or involves an important client relationship. If employees believe that following verification procedures will be viewed as delaying the business, they may be more likely to bypass those procedures.
Leadership plays a significant role in establishing expectations. Executives should follow the same approval and verification requirements as other employees and avoid asking teams to make exceptions for convenience or speed.
A strong cybersecurity culture depends on employees understanding their responsibilities and having the support to follow procedures, even when that means delaying a transaction or questioning a senior leader.
Business leaders do not need to oversee every technical component of their organization’s cybersecurity program. They should, however, understand how business processes can create exposure and whether appropriate safeguards are consistently applied.
Three areas deserve particular attention.
Employee awareness remains an important part of cybersecurity, but organizations cannot depend on training alone to prevent every fraudulent request or unauthorized action.
Business processes need to account for situations where a request appears legitimate; an employee is under pressure, or someone attempts to bypass established procedures. Clear verification requirements, defined responsibilities and consistent leadership support can create a cybersecurity culture that helps prevent those situations from becoming costly incidents.
If your organization is reviewing its cybersecurity program or evaluating how internal processes may create security risks, contact our Cybersecurity Consulting Services Team to discuss your organization’s needs.
Reporting window: September 28 – October 12, 2026 (trailing 14 days) This period had one defining pattern. Attackers came in through access someone else had already approved: a vendor’s login to a national register, an employee’s cloud credentials, a customer portal, and the consoles that manage whole networks. One ransomware attack on a cloud provider…
Reporting window: September 14 – September 28, 2026 (trailing 14 days) What Actually Matters This Cycle Executive Snapshot This cycle in one line: Attackers are going straight at the systems that hold people data, from HR and recruiting platforms to court records and a Pentagon personnel server, and many of the worst exposures trace back…
Cyber threats have changed significantly in just a few years. Attackers are increasingly using legitimate credentials rather than trying to break through traditional security controls. Cloud platforms, third-party relationships and expanding digital ecosystems have created more ways to access an organization’s systems and data. Artificial intelligence is making social engineering faster and more convincing. At…
