Articles 2 min read

Accounting For Investment Contracts: Allocated Versus Unallocated Funding Arrangements

In March 2010, in a response to a request by TIAA CREF for an opinion, the DOL issued advisory opinion 2010-01A.

This advisory opinion states that only contracts that meet all of the following conditions can be considered allocated contracts (and therefore be accounted for as participant distributions for financial reporting purposes):

In the case of this advisory opinion, the DOL concluded that TIAA CREF’s traditional annuity contract provided for market value adjustments and therefore did not meet the specified amount criteria, since the contract guaranteed only a minimum rate of return and the actual rate of return varied from year to year, based on changes in market value. In addition, the DOL concluded that any vesting requirements of such contracts were inconsistent with the definition of an allocated contract.

For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, these contracts cannot be treated as an allocated contract for purposes of audited financial statements, submitted with Form 5500. Plan sponsors should consider this advisory opinion as part of their accounting for investments in such contracts.